Skip to content

Would You Pull The Lever Leading To One Death But Saving Five Or Not Why

From a simple utilitarian point of view, the dilemma is the same — do you sacrifice one life to save five? — and the answer is the same: yes. Interestingly, however, many people who would pull the lever in the first scenario would not push the man in this second scenario.

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, …

But you do have access to a lever. If pulled; it will divert the train from the left lane to the right hand one. In effect, if you pull the lever; you will be …

Should you pull the lever Trolley Problem?

The Trolley Problem: In Defence Of Doing Nothing If you pull the lever, you’re causing the death of the one person. Causing people to die seems like killing. And killing people is wrong. Ergo, we shouldn’t pull the lever.

Is it morally permissible to pull the lever?

Indirect Utilitarians. In the trolley problem case; they state pulling the lever is the action that, there and then, produces the most welfare — so that makes it morally right.

Does the utilitarian think it’s OK to turn the runaway trolley killing one to save five?

Meanwhile, the deontological perspective asserts that certain actions – like killing an innocent person – are just wrong, even if they have good consequences. In both versions of the trolley problem above, utilitarians say you should sacrifice one to save five, while deontologists say you should not.

Is there a correct answer to the trolley problem?

No Solution, No Problem Like most philosophical problems, the Trolley Problem is not designed to have a solution. It is, rather, intended to provoke thought, and create an intellectual discourse in which the difficulty of resolving moral dilemmas is appreciated, and our limitations as moral agents are recognized.

Would you sacrifice one person to save five What if you had to cause harm with your own hands?

Simply put, this doctrine states that it is morally acceptable to do something that causes a serious harm in the course of promoting some greater good if the harm in question is not an intended consequence of the action but is, rather, an unintended side-effect.

What is the correct answer to the trolley problem?

The only way to save the lives of the five workers is to divert the trolley onto another track that only has one worker on it. If Adam diverts the trolley onto the other track, this one worker will die, but the other five workers will be saved.

What we can learn from the trolley problem?

The trolley dilemma allows us to think through the consequences of an action and consider whether its moral value is determined solely by its outcome.

Does utilitarianism say that it is permissible to sacrifice one to save many?

Utilitarianism ultimately says that it is permissible to sacrifice the happiness of one if it benefits the majority. The Ethics of Persons agrees with this because it allows for some acts to be mandatory it allows for human prosperity.

More Answers On Would You Pull The Lever Leading To One Death But Saving Five Or Not Why

Would you pull the lever to one death but saving five? Why or why not?

In a study known as the ’Trolley Dilemma’, you witness a train hurtling down the tracks towards five workers who cannot hear its arrival. There is a lever. If you pull the lever, you save the five workers and divert the track towards one lone worker. He dies. If you don’t pull the lever, five are killed. What would you do?

Trolley Dilemma: Kill One Person to Save Five? – ThoughtCo

Five lives saved is better than one life saved. Therefore, the right thing to do is to pull the lever. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism. It judges actions by their consequences. But there are many who think that we have to consider other aspects of action as well.

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the…

The Trolley Dilemma: Would You Kill One Person to Save Five?

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the person on the side track. But in the footbridge scenario, pushing the fat man over the side is in intentional act of killing.

Would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five?

Jan 20, 2022Would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five? Advertisement justinecalderon13 is waiting for your help. Add your answer and earn points. Answer 0 edbr4632 Answer: Yes, but only my death to save 5 people Advertisement

The trolley dilemma—would you kill one person to save five?

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the…

Moral dilemma: Would you kill one person to save five?

Of the 147 participants, 133 (or 90.5 percent) pulled the switch to divert the boxcar, resulting in the death of the one hiker. Fourteen participants allowed the boxcar to kill the five hikers (11 participants did not pull the switch, while three pulled the switch but then returned it to its original position).

Why I wouldn’t pull that lever.. I think at this point everyone has …

Dec 5, 2020No one would blame you for their death, as you are not responsible, but if you pull that lever you will forever be haunted by your decision. You pulled the level, you killed that man. Every day, we…

The Value of Life: Whose Life Do We Value? – The Ethics Institute Blog

You realize that if you pull the lever, the tram will be diverted down a second set of tracks away from the five unsuspecting workers.However, down this side track is one unsuspecting bystander, just as oblivious as his colleagues. Would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five?

Trolley dilemma—would you kill one person to save five?

However, down this side track is one lone worker, just as oblivious as his colleagues. So, would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five? This is the crux of the classic thought experiment known as the trolley dilemma, developed by philosopher Philippa Foot in 1967 and adapted by Judith Jarvis Thomson in 1985.

Would you kill one person to save five others? – BusinessTech

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the…

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

There are nothing you to rescue the five people except that there is a level near track.if you put the level, the train will be directed to another track. Which has one person die to it. You havr two choice. A) do nothing and five people will die B) or pull the level and save the five people, but that one person will die

If you could pull a lever to redirect a train to kill 1 person … – Quora

Answer (1 of 9): 1. I read somewhere that most people would pull the lever, the difference in the answers is how long it takes people to decide and how obvious the answer seems to them. I think the answer is perfectly simple, save one, kill five or save five, kill one? One person can die if five …

Moral Dilemma Activity. Imagine you are standing beside some…

No, I will not pull the lever. Consider it this way: “There is a massive earthquake coming that will kill thousands, of people however, you cannot stop it by killing one individual. That’s why I’d rather let the earthquake happen because earthquakes are completely inanimate phenomena, they are not responsible for any deaths they cause.

Which Miraculous Would You Hold? – Quiz – Quotev

Mar 4, 2021You realise that if you pull the lever, the train will be diverted down a second set of tracks away from the five unsuspecting workers. However, down this side track is one lone worker, just as oblivious as his colleagues. So, would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five? I’d pull the lever (save 5 people) I wouldn’t pull the lever (save 1 person) I prefer not to answer. 7 …

Does our personality type affect our choices? | QuizMaker

You realise that if you pull the lever, the tram will be diverted down a second set of tracks away from the five unsuspecting workers. However, down this side track is one lone worker, just as oblivious as his colleagues. So, would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five?, Why did/didn’t you pull the lever?

World Congress of Philosophy

So, would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five? The trolley problem is a series of thought experiments in ethics and psychology, involving stylized ethical dilemmas of whether to sacrifice one person to save a larger number. Opinions on the ethics of each scenario turn out to be sensitive to details of the story that may seem immaterial to the abstract dilemma. The question …

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the …

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the person on the side track. But in the footbridge scenario, pushing the fat man over the side is in intentional act of killing.

Would you kill one person to save five others? – BusinessTech

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the …

Trolley dilemma—would you kill one person to save five?

However, down this side track is one lone worker, just as oblivious as his colleagues. So, would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five? This is the crux of the classic thought experiment known as the trolley dilemma, developed by philosopher Philippa Foot in 1967 and adapted by Judith Jarvis Thomson in 1985.

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

Foot argued that there’s a distinction between killing and letting die. The former is active while the latter is passive. In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the person on the side track.

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

It’s out of control and heading for five unsuspecting bystanders! Shutterstock. Imagine you are standing beside some tram tracks. In the distance, you spot a runaway trolley hurtling down the tracks towards five workers who cannot hear it coming. Even if they do spot it, they won’t be able to move out of the way in time.

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the person on the side track. But in the footbridge scenario, pushing the fat man over the side is in intentional act of killing.

How one of the world’s most difficult philosophical questions decides …

So, would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five? This is the crux of the classic thought experiment known as the trolley dilemma, developed by philosopher Philippa Foot in 1967 and adapted by Judith Jarvis Thomson in 1985. The trolley dilemma allows us to think through the consequences of an action and consider whether its moral value is determined solely by its outcome. The …

The Value of Life: Whose Life Do We Value? – ethics in schools

Would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five? – (Philippa Foot, 1967; adapted by Judith Jarvis Thompson, 1985) There is a huge difference between The Trolley Problem and the cover story of The New York Times Magazine : one is fiction and one is not.

Given the trolley problem, would you pull the lever or not? Why?

Answer (1 of 5): Given the trolley problem, would you pull the lever or not? Why? Yes, I would pull the lever. Why? To minimize the effects of the tragedy that is about to happen. And, yes, I understand this means I take a part in killing the single person. I can live with that better than stand…

Ethical issues in the fields of artificial intelligence, self-driving …

this side track is one lone worker, just as oblivious as his colleagues. So, would you pull the lever, leading . to one death but saving five? ” 37. 33 “What is Machine Learning? A definition …

Would You Kill One Person To Save Five? – Veterans Today

From a simple utilitarian point of view, the dilemma is the same — do you sacrifice one life to save five? — and the answer is the same: yes. Interestingly, however, many people who would pull the lever in the first scenario would not push the man in this second scenario. This raises two questions:

The Trolley Problem: What’s the Right Solution? – Kialo

If you seek external wisdom on whether or not to pull the lever, it will probably be that you should pull it. By consciously pulling the lever, rather than passively watching, you choose to kill one person instead of merely allowing five people to die. This active choice is immoral.

Resource

https://www.quora.com/Would-you-pull-the-lever-to-one-death-but-saving-five-Why-or-why-not?share=1
https://www.thoughtco.com/would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five-4045377
https://theconversation.com/the-trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five-57111
https://www.sciencealert.com/the-trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five
https://brainly.com/question/26294575
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-06-trolley-dilemmawould-person.html
https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2011/moral-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five
https://medium.com/the-philosophers-stone/why-i-wouldnt-pull-that-lever-2540d4f91fc6
https://www.ethicsinschools.org/the-value-of-life/
https://www.daily-sun.com/post/141722/Trolley-dilemma%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%80%9Dwould-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five
https://businesstech.co.za/news/trending/125699/would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five-others/
https://primewriters.us/blog/the-trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five
https://www.quora.com/If-you-could-pull-a-lever-to-redirect-a-train-to-kill-1-person-instead-of-5-would-you-If-you-could-harvest-organs-from-an-unwilling-donor-to-save-5-patients-would-you-Why-do-peoples-answers-differ-between-the-two?share=1
https://www.coursehero.com/tutors-problems/English/39460968–Moral-Dilemma-Activity-Imagine-you-are-standing-beside/
https://www.quotev.com/quiz/13618736/Which-Miraculous-Would-You-Hold
https://take.quiz-maker.com/QST4FG6
https://worldcongressofphilosophy.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-save-five-reza-arzani
http://www.australasianscience.com.au/article/science-and-technology/trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-save-five.html
https://businesstech.co.za/news/trending/125699/would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five-others/
https://www.daily-sun.com/post/141722/Trolley-dilemma%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%80%9Dwould-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five
https://www.dailybulletin.com.au/the-conversation/19420-the-trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five
https://www.businesses.com.au/general-business/418017-the-trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five
https://dir.md/the-trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five-57111?host=theconversation.com
https://www.thechainsaw.com/how-one-of-the-worlds-most-difficult-philosophical-questions-decides-who-lives-and-dies-2016-6
https://www.ethicsinschools.org/the-value-of-life/
https://www.quora.com/Given-the-trolley-problem-would-you-pull-the-lever-or-not-Why?share=1
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339501866_Ethical_issues_in_the_fields_of_artificial_intelligence_self-driving_vehicles_and_autonomous_weapon_systems
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/03/11/would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five/
https://www.kialo.com/the-trolley-problem-whats-the-right-solution-921