Was The Sherman Really A Bad Tank

More Answers On Was The Sherman Really A Bad Tank

Was the M-4 Sherman Tank Actually Pretty Bad?

Simply put, in the heat of battle it was as dangerous inside of a Sherman tank as it was outside of one. “The 3rd Armored Division entered combat in Normandy with 232 M-4 Sherman tanks,” writes…

Was the M4 Sherman a bad tank? – Quora

Originally Answered: Was the Sherman tank really as bad as people say? I think it depends on what you were looking for in a tank. In general a Sherman would be outfought by its German counterparts, the Sherman’s armor was not as thick and its gun was not as strong. So in pure anti-tank combat power, the Sherman was inferior.

Tank Expert : Was the Sherman really that bad? – Big Board Gaming

Commenting on the worlds impression of the Sherman tanks, which evidently evolved from British writers in the 70’s : “And the British side did take disproportionate casualties in Normandy. And it’s largely for tactical reasons. I’m not going to get into it, it’s way too complicated to explain, but yes the British did suffer very high …

r/tanks – How bad was the sherman really? – reddit.com

What made it bad against the Germans was that the Germans had a mixture of tanks. They had the massed number of smaller tanks that can take the mass of the battle, and then the heavy hammers that delivers the blow: Tiger, Tiger II, Ferdinand, Jagdpanther, Jagdtiger.

#38 The Shermans Flaws: What Was Wrong With The … – The Sherman Tank Site

01/04/2016 falsehoods, Sherman Tank front drive, Sherman Flaws, To Tall The Shermans Flaws: Yeah, I know the Sherman Had Flaws. It Just Had So Many Fewer Than Any German Tank! T he Sherman tank, like anything man produces, was series of compromises to meet the US Army’s design specifications.

How good or bad were the Sherman Tanks | History Forum

The Sherman Firefly was used by the British. The tank was armed with the excellent 76mm 17pdr ATG which gave it a fighting chance in a mano a mano against the Tiger or Panther. Here, the usual determinant was the crew. Early on the Sherman had problems with the ammo storage which could brew up when the tank was penetrated by a round.

The Sherman was actually a great WWII tank – We Are The Mighty

The Sherman was actually a great WWII tank Miguel Ortiz Posted On February 09, 2021 20:54:26 U.S. tanks were inferior to German tanks in WWII and were cut down in swathes, or so people tend to believe. After all, American tankers supposedly nicknamed the Sherman the “Ronson” because it “lights every time.”

#24 Silly Myths and Fun Facts About the Sherman … – The Sherman Tank Site

T his is a very common argument or myth that comes from German Armor “fanboys” also known as the infamous ’Wehraboo’, and they will sometimes be shocked if you say no, as if they thought the info about the Sherman being a better tank was all lies, and when faced with the ’truth’ of combat you would have to choose their favorite German tank.

Why does the M4 Sherman get a bad reputation? : AskHistorians

the sherman wasn’t really a bad tank- far from it, it was probably the most sophisticated tank of the war- but one need understand that between the guy who’s story is, “i was in a tank for a year and change, we shot at stuff, some stuff shot back, nothing really happened” and the guy who’s story is, “oh my god everything was exploding and my …

How reliable was the Sherman tank? | Warspot.net

One of the readers of the Reddit.com asked an interesting question, which our author Peter Samsonov could not pass by. We quote the question here: «I read once that Sherman tanks could go 500 miles before the engine fell apart and presumably would need a major overhaul. For the life of me, I can’t locate anything about this.

The Sherman Was America’s Best Worst Tank – War Is Boring

The M-4 Sherman, in particular, helped the U.S. Army win the war—even though, in battle, German tanks destroyed them en masse. The Sherman’s inadequacies were products of its origins. Before the war, American tank design and development was bipolar—a result of the competing demands of the Army’s infantry and cavalry branches.

Was the M4 Sherman a good or bad tank? : AskHistorians – reddit

An American study conducted in France for instance found that 65% of Shermans burned when they were knocked out. 1 While a study of the British 8th and 24th Armor Brigades found that about 56% of there tanks burned when knocked out. 1 Another study found that they burned about 80% of the time.

#25 The Conclusions: Was The Sherman Good … – The Sherman Tank Site

Shermans in the Jungle. M y conclusion on the Sherman is that the reputation it has received in recent years is unfair, and the Sherman, in fact, was the best tank of the war. I base this on the tanks widespread use, ease of production, reliability, and combat record. It was not a perfect tank and did have a series of minor flaws.

#20 How The Sherman Compared To Its … – The Sherman Tank Site

This tank fought from the first days of the war and really was a great little tank. Too bad the Sherman, all models, outclassed it in just about every important way. The Sherman had better armor, firepower, and similar mobility. Even with its most potent gun, a long 50mm, the PIII had trouble with the Grant and Lee, let alone an M4.

Was the Sherman that bad? : Warthunder – reddit

“Was the Sherman that bad” The Sherman, when it first appeared, was the best overall tank on the battlefield in the western theater of war. It was much superior to any German tank in wide spread service in North Africa. Even the Germans commented that it was the best tank on the field other than the handful of tigers that arrived.

German tanks Bad | The Sherman Tank Site

T he M4 Sherman was a very good tank for exploiting a breakthrough, engaging armor and supporting infantry. As the war progressed, the tank improved, in both major and minor ways, and at the Shermans entrance to the war, and at the end, it was arguably the best tank of the war. The M4A3e8 with 76mm gun was everything you want in a tank with …

M4 Sherman. Right tank for the wrong war? | alternatehistory.com

The US and Brits didn’t have that pressure until encountering the Panther and Tigers. So the Sherman was a great western style design, but found that in terms of quality it was just outclassed by the German heavies and didn’t have a tank to really compete with the reality of the new 40 ton and up medium AFV standard set in the East.

The U.S. Army’s World War II Sherman Tank: Best Worst Tank They Had?

The M-4 Sherman, in particular, helped the U.S. Army win the war—even though, in battle, German tanks destroyed them en masse. This first appeared in 2014. The Sherman’s inadequacies were …

Sherman’s bad reputation – Ask the experts – War Thunder

The Sherman doesn’t have a “bad” reputation. The M4 Sherman tank has more of a reputation for mediocrity. Or being average. It wasn’t as good a basic design as the T-34 nor the Pzkpfw V Panther and was pretty equivalent to the also mediocre design of the Pzkpfw IV series of Nazi Germany.

Was The Sherman A Good Tank? : WorldWar2

Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts

The Sherman Was America’s Best Worst Tank – War Is Boring

The Sherman wasn’t the best tank, but thanks to efficient American production methods it would be the most prolific. The United States built a staggering 49,234 Sherman tanks between 1942 and 1945. The majority went to the U.S. Army and Marine Corps, which underwent a massive wartime expansion. Washington provided 21,959 tanks to Allied forces.

A Poor Defense: Sherman tanks in WW2 – University of Illinois Archives

On the contrary, this tank suffered from serious design flaws. Perhaps it is more appropriate to say that it was the soldiers within these tanks that bore the brunt of the Sherman’s problems. Sherman tanks first saw action in North Africa in 1942. At the time they fared well against the German equivalent tank, the Panzer IV.

Tank Busting – Blowing Up the Myth of the Mighty M4 Sherman …

Sherman crews were less than enthusiastic about their tanks than the generals were. (Image provided by the author) The Battle of the Bulge exposed deficiencies in the M4 so glaringly obvious, what became known as the Sherman Tank Scandal would be splashed across front pages all over the Allied world. “Whoever was responsible for supplying the army with tanks is guilty of supplying material …

The Truth: How Effective Was The Sherman … – For The Love Of Tanks

The Sherman Ic Hybrid is interesting as the hull consisted of a cast front and welded back. This gave the front of the tank the stronger armour capabilities (where it was needed) but kept the simple construction and maintenance of the welded hull where armour was less vital (the back half). The cast front mitigated any weaknesses in weld lines …

Did the M4 Sherman really have bad defence? | WWII Forums

ye teh sherman woz terrible da panzer and tiger woz invincible it took leik 10 shermans 2 kill one tiger. It’s mostly modern-day sources compare it to the Panther or Tiger, wich makes it seem like a terrible tank. It was as good as the PzKpfw IV, which is also a medium tank, like the Sherman.

Why the Army’s M-4 Sherman Tank Was Slaughtered During World War II

German tanks boasted better armor protection and more firepower. But armor and lethality don’t tell the whole story. The same American tanks were superior to their rivals in other important ways. The M-4 Sherman tank, in particular, helped the U.S. Army win the war—even though, in battle, German tanks destroyed them en masse.

How good or bad were the Sherman Tanks – History Forum

The Sherman tank was inferior to most of the tanks fielded by Germany, but the key to its success was the fact that there were something like 20 M4 for every pzkpfw of the Wermacht.The number of 46.920 Shermans produced is simply impressive. … M4 Sherman: Was It Really That Bad? | Socyberty Tanks in World War 2 Forum • View topic …

M4 Sherman Tank Facts – World War 2 Facts

The U.S. M4 Sherman Tank, formally known as the Medium Tank M4 was the main tank used by the U.S. and some of its allies during the Second World War. Despite being inferior to the heavier German tanks it was a reliable and capable tank and would play a part in winning the war. Other than by the U.S. forces the M4 was also used by British Commonwealth countries and the Soviet Union through the …

Why was the M4 Sherman Labelled a Mediocre Tank?

Why has the M4 Sherman still labelled a so-so battle tank of WWII? In my mind the M4 Sherman always seemed to be a competent AFV that played a integral part in the victory of the Allies with it’s robust mechanics, decent ergonomics, sufficient armour and adequet armaments – it was a vastly…

Amazon.com: Customer reviews: For Want of a Gun: The Sherman Tank …

The guy who gave the Sherman a bad name did no research. He repaired Tanks for the US Army and saw only the US tanks, and did not see all the German tanks destroyed by the Americans. There were actually more lost German tanks, and the Germans were on the defensive so had a big advantage. I would say that the Sherman proved it was an excellent …