And it wasn’t necessary either. Militarily Japan was finished (as the Soviet invasion of Manchuria that August showed). Further blockade and urban destruction would have produced a surrender in August or September at the latest, without the need for the costly anticipated invasion or the atomic bomb.
According to Truman and others in his administration, the use of the atomic bomb was intended to cut the war in the Pacific short, avoiding a U.S. invasion of Japan and saving hundreds of thousands of American lives.
The bombs brought a quick end to the war. Without the bombs, the war would have likely dragged on for at least another year, perhaps longer. The Allies’ plan for Japan was called Operation Downfall and consisted of two parts, Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet.
It was inhumane. It caused too much destruction. It killed too many innocent people, including children. It was unnecessary as Japan was essentially defeated.
Why the atomic bombs were necessary?
Official A-Bomb Justification: Save US Lives According to Truman and others in his administration, the use of the atomic bomb was intended to cut the war in the Pacific short, avoiding a U.S. invasion of Japan and saving hundreds of thousands of American lives.
Would the war have ended without the atomic bomb?
The bombs brought a quick end to the war. Without the bombs, the war would have likely dragged on for at least another year, perhaps longer. The Allies’ plan for Japan was called Operation Downfall and consisted of two parts, Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet.
Were the bombs dropped on Japan necessary?
The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan. — Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan.
Why was the atomic bomb not needed?
It was inhumane. It caused too much destruction. It killed too many innocent people, including children. It was unnecessary as Japan was essentially defeated.
Why the atomic bomb is necessary?
A bloody invasion and round-the-clock conventional bombing would have led to a far higher death toll and so the atomic weapons actually saved thousands of American and millions of Japanese lives. The bombs were the best means to bring about unconditional surrender, which is what the US leaders wanted.
Was the use of the atomic bomb necessary to end the war?
“No. And it wasn’t necessary either. Militarily Japan was finished (as the Soviet invasion of Manchuria that August showed). Further blockade and urban destruction would have produced a surrender in August or September at the latest, without the need for the costly anticipated invasion or the atomic bomb.
Could we have won ww2 without the atomic bomb?
The US Strategic Bombing Survey concluded that, even without the use of the atomic bombs, without the Soviet Union entering the war and without an Allied invasion of Japan, the war would have ended before December 31, 1945 and, in all likelihood, before November 1, 1945.
Would Japan surrendered without the atomic bomb?
However, the overwhelming historical evidence from American and Japanese archives indicates that Japan would have surrendered that August, even if atomic bombs had not been used — and documents prove that President Harry Truman and his closest advisers knew it.
What would happen if an atomic bomb went off?
BLAST WAVE can cause death, injury, and damage to structures several miles out from the blast. RADIATION can damage cells of the body. FIRE AND HEAT can cause death, burn injuries, and damage to structures several miles out.
Was the atomic bomb necessary for stopping the Japanese?
“No. And it wasn’t necessary either. Militarily Japan was finished (as the Soviet invasion of Manchuria that August showed). Further blockade and urban destruction would have produced a surrender in August or September at the latest, without the need for the costly anticipated invasion or the atomic bomb.
What were the benefits of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan?
The most common advantage usually cited for dropping the atomic bombs is that the action would spare more lives than it cost. There had been recent battles at Okinawa and Iwo Jima that had already cost the American military forces thousands of lives.
Was the second atomic bomb necessary?
General Leslie R. Groves, the man responsible for organizing the Manhattan Project, which solved the problem of producing and delivering the nuclear explosion, estimated that another atom bomb would be ready to use against Japan by August 17 or 18—but it was not necessary.
Why did the US want to drop the bombs on Japan?
President Harry S. Truman, warned by some of his advisers that any attempt to invade Japan would result in horrific American casualties, ordered that the new weapon be used to bring the war to a speedy end.
Why the use of the atomic bomb was not necessary?
Several leading air commanders, including Generals Hap Arnold and Curtis LeMay, said that the atomic bombs were unnecessary because conventional bombing had already brought Japan to its knees. Remarks of this sort can be understood in the context of internal military politics and budgetary positioning.
Why have atomic bombs not been used since World war II?
Thankfully, nuclear weapons have not been exploded in war since 1945, perhaps owing to the taboo against their use shaped by the dropping of the bombs on Japan.
Why did people oppose the atomic bomb?
Those who oppose the bombings argue it was militarily unnecessary, inherently immoral, a war crime, or a form of state terrorism. Critics believe a naval blockade and conventional bombings would have forced Japan to surrender unconditionally.
More Answers On Was The Atomic Bomb Necessary
Were the Atomic Bombings Necessary?
The use of the atomic bombs was the culmination of an air war fought against civilians in Germany and Japan, an air war that showed increasing contempt for the lives of civilians and for the laws of war. The end of the war was a great relief to those who had fought for so long.
Was the dropping of the atomic bombs necessary? – Japan Today
The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War.
Was the Atomic Bomb Necessary? – StudyDriver.com
Was the Atomic Bomb Necessary? Death, destruction and devastation this is what the US decided to burden fellow human beings. The US was not justified in dropping the two atomic bombs on Japan. They killed a massive amount of innocent people and effected many more.
Why was dropping the atomic bomb necessary?
Why was dropping the atomic bomb necessary? In the end, he made the decision to drop the atomic bombs on strategic cities. His stated intention in ordering the bombings was to save American lives, to bring about a quick resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction, sufficient to cause Japan to surrender.
Were the Atomic Bombs Necessary? – Soapboxie – Owlcation
The American decision to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in August of 1945, resulted in the death of several hundred thousand Japanese military personnel and civilians. Reports indicate that the bombs, in total, claimed around 150,000 to 200,000 lives (O’Reilly and Rooney, 57). Official deaths are widely unknown, however, due …
Was using the atomic bomb necessary to end WW II?
Aug 5, 2015President Harry Truman and defenders of the atomic bomb attacks argued that it saved lives by preventing an invasion of Japan that could have resulted in up to 1 million casualties.
The Bomb Was Not Necessary | History News Network
The Bomb Was Not Necessary | History News Network The Bomb Was Not Necessary Historians/History 1.1k Shares 91 66 18 by John J. McLaughlin Mr. McLaughlin received his PhD in history from Drew…
Was It Necessary to Drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Why exactly were the bombs used? 1. To secure a quick, painless victory for the Allies with the least possible deaths (for them). 2. To save money. Using the bombs was the most cost effective…
Debate over the Bomb | Atomic Heritage Foundation
Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Date: Friday, June 6, 2014. One of the greatest controversies to come out of World War II was whether the atomic bomb was necessary to bring about the war’s end. Supporters of the bombings generally believe that they prevented an invasion of the Japanese mainland, saving more lives than they took by doing so.
The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb: Arguments in Support
Argument #1.2: It Was Necessary to Shorten the War Another concurrent argument supporting the use of the bomb is that it achieved its primary objective of shortening the war. The bombs were dropped on August 6 and 9. The next day, the Japanese requested a halting of the war.
Was Hiroshima Necessary? – Institute for Historical Review
Apart from the moral questions involved, were the atomic bombings militarily necessary? By any rational yardstick, they were not. Japan already had been defeated militarily by June 1945. Almost nothing was left of the once mighty Imperial Navy, and Japan’s air force had been all but totally destroyed.
Reasons Against Dropping the Atomic Bomb – History
It was intended to be a deterrent, to make Germany or any other enemy think twice before using such a weapon against the United States. To bolster their argument, these critics point out that ever since WWII, the weapon has been used only as a deterrent.
Was The Atomic Bomb Necessary History Essay – UKEssays.com
But the answer to the fundamental question of whether the use of the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary appears to be yes. It was becessary to end the war as qucikly as possible. And yes it was necessary to save the lives of American troops, perhaps numbering in the serveral thousands even millions (American Decades, 387)
Atomic Bomb | World War 2 Facts
The atomic bombings were devastating. The surrender that they hoped to accomplish with the bombings came on 15 August 1945, six days after the bombing of Nagasaki. Thus the last member of the Axis had surrendered effectively ending World War 2. While the war was over, the doubts regarding the use of the bomb had just begun.
Why Is The Atomic Bomb Important – 1817 Words | Studymode
On August 6, 1945, the United States of America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. The United States was justified to do this because of the unprovoked attack and bombing of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which occurred three years prior to the bombing of Hiroshima, and it was necessary to stop the war because it saved thousands of American lives.
Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb | APECSEC.org
The cons of dropping the atomic bomb include the following: 1. When other countries realized that America held this type of power, they began the race to develop their own. 2. Thousands of innocent Japanese people died from the impact of the bomb, millions more where affected by the residual radiation. 3.
Were the use of atomic bombs in WW2 necessary? – Quora
Yes, it was necessary to use them. Truman decided to use them on the chance that it would influence the Japanese to surrender and many lives would be saved. What lives?, you might ask. The context was that the Japanese were stubbornly insisting on not surrendering. The USA was preparing to launch an invasion of the Japanese home islands.
The Atomic Bomb: Was It Nessesary Essay – Artscolumbia
The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. We have won the race of discovery against the Germans. We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans. We shall continue to use it until we completely destroy Japans power to make war.
Were Atomic Bombs Necessary to End World War Two?
Atomic Weapons Were Not Needed to End the War, or to Save Lives General (and later president) Dwight Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of all Allied Forces, said: “The Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing.” (Newsweek, 11/11/63, Ike on Ike).
Atomic Bomb: Inventors, WWII & Facts – HISTORY
The atomic bomb, and nuclear bombs, are powerful weapons that use nuclear reactions as their source of explosive energy. Scientists first developed nuclear weapons technology during World War II….
From the Archives: Atomic Bombing of Japan was Unnecessary
Sixty years ago, on Aug. 6 and 9, atomic bombs destroyed the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most Americans think the bombings forced Japan to surrender. And further, most believe that they were necessary as the only way to end World War II without a costly invasion. But new research findings suggest both judgments are wrong.
The Story of the Atomic Bomb | eHISTORY
The B-29 was the logical choice in view of its long range, superior high-altitude performance, and ability to carry an atomic bomb that was expected to weigh 9000 to 10,000 pounds. In March and again in June dummy atomic bombs were dropped by B-29s at Muroc Army Air Force Base in California to test the release mechanism. In August seventeen B …
The Japanese Atomic Bombs Were Necessary
This current age of nuclear anxiety and turmoil started in the 1940s when the US developed the first atomic bombs in 1945. The atomic bomb was then used to level both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, bringing an end to WW2 and highlighting the shocking power of this weapon. Hundreds of thousands of people died and many others contracted ailments related …
Reasons In Favor of the Atomic Bombing of Japan – History Crunch
In a statement after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, United States President Truman stated that the “Japanese began the war from the air at Pearl Harbor… [and have now] been repaid many fold.” As such, many historians view the atomic bombing of Japan as a necessary and justified retaliation for the attack at Pearl Harbor.
Why The Atomic Bomb Was Necessary – 563 Words | Bartleby
Why The Atomic Bomb Was Necessary. On August 6, 1945 when President Truman decided to bomb Hiroshima with the bomb nicknamed “little boy” causing over 6 percent of the city to be leveled out and causing 70,000 civilians casualties. But the real question was if this act was necessary. The evidence points out that yes it was a necessity to …
Was the Atomic Bomb Needed? Hiroshima and Moral Injury
One is that the use of the atomic bomb was the end process of a technological roller coaster; it was built at great cost (the uranium enrichment plant at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for example, used more electrical power in 1945 than all of Canada) and had to be used to justify that. Revenge for Pearl Harbor and racism (“dirty Japs”) are also …
Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb | Harry S. Truman
Eleven days later, on August 6, 1945, having received no reply, an American bomber called the Enola Gay left the Tinian Island in route toward Japan. In the belly of the bomber was “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb. At 8:15 am Hiroshima time, “Little Boy” was dropped. The result was approximately 80,000 deaths in just the first few minutes.
Were Atomic Bombs Necessary to End World War Two?
The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all.” No Invasion was Necessary. The Vice Chairman of the U.S. Bombing Survey Paul Nitze wrote: “I concluded that even without the atomic bomb, Japan was likely to surrender in a matter of months. My own view was that Japan would capitulate by November 1945. Even without the …
Lessons of War: Atomic Bombs Necessary To Win The War? by Ed Vincent
SUMMARY. U.S. interrogation of Japanese government and military officials immediately following the end of the Pacific War confirmed that the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were militarily unnecessary and did not influence Japan’s decision to surrender. That decision had been made two months prior in June 1945 following seven …
Were the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary?
The United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. This was the second atomic bomb dropped by the US, the first being on Hiroshima on August 6. The two bombs together killed at least 1,29,000 people, most of whom died on the day of the bombing. Many survivors died later through radioactive injuries …
Resource
https://www.wagingpeace.org/were-the-atomic-bombings-necessary/
https://japantoday.com/category/features/opinions/was-the-dropping-of-the-atomic-bombs-necessary
https://studydriver.com/was-the-atomic-bomb-necessary/
https://www.studiodessuantbone.com/paper-writing-help-blog/why-was-dropping-the-atomic-bomb-necessary/
https://soapboxie.com/world-politics/Hiroshima-and-Nagasaki-Were-the-Atomic-Bombs-Necessary-for-Victory
https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/daily-southtown/opinion/ct-sta-kirstein-bomb-st-0806-20150805-story.html
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/129964
https://medium.com/historical-musings/was-it-necessary-to-drop-the-atomic-bomb-on-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-e8981c1ff322
https://www.atomicheritage.org/history/debate-over-bomb
https://www.historyonthenet.com/decision-use-atomic-bomb-arguments-support
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p-4_Weber.html
https://www.historyonthenet.com/reasons-against-dropping-the-atomic-bomb
https://www.ukessays.com/essays/history/was-the-atomic-bomb-necessary-history-essay.php
http://www.worldwar2facts.org/atomic-bomb.html
https://www.studymode.com/essays/Why-Is-The-Atomic-Bomb-Important-DBBB5C592E7C4BF7.html
https://apecsec.org/pros-and-cons-of-dropping-the-atomic-bomb/
https://www.quora.com/Were-the-use-of-atomic-bombs-in-WW2-necessary?share=1
https://artscolumbia.org/the-atomic-bomb-was-it-nessesary-essay-106283/
https://www.hmsschoolofchristianjournalism.org/articles/were-atomic-bombs-necessary-to-end-world-war-two
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/atomic-bomb-history
https://progressive.org/op-eds/archives-atomic-bombing-japan-unnecessary/
https://ehistory.osu.edu/articles/story-atomic-bomb
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/japanese-atomic-bombs-were-necessary
https://www.historycrunch.com/reasons-in-favor-of-the-atomic-bombing-of-japan.html
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Why-The-Atomic-Bomb-Was-Necessary-PCV7FKK88T
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/was-the-atomic-bomb-needed-hiroshima-and-moral-injury_b_59243192e4b0b28a33f62f60
https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/presidential-inquiries/decision-drop-atomic-bomb
https://www.nordskogpublishing.com/were-atomic-bombs-necessary-to-end-world-war-two/
https://6thbombgroup.com/were-atomic-bombs-necessary/
https://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/standpoint-were-the-atomic-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-necessary-2112610